Cases 41 - 50 of 63
CITY OF WHEATLAND, CALIFORNIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
CITY OF WHEATLAND, CALIFORNIA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv01854
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
BROWNS VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv01597
Plaintiff:
BROWNS VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
CRAIG COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER, ET AL
as 1:2012cv01179
Plaintiff:
CRAIG COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CARROLL COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv01166
Plaintiff:
CARROLL COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
WYTHE COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00719
Plaintiff:
WYTHE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
GRAYSON COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00718
Plaintiff:
GRAYSON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
MERCED COUNTY, CALIFORNIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00354
Plaintiff:
MERCED COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CITY OF PINSON, ALABAMA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00255
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PINSON, ALABAMA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
