Cases 101 - 110 of 325
EL-AMIN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
SALEEM EL-AMIN
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL-AMIN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
SALEEM EL-AMIN
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saleem El-Amin v. April Downs, et al
as 16-7145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Saleem El-Amin
Defendant - Appellee:
April Downs, Office of Attorney and District of Columbia
EL-AMIN v. DOWNS et al
as 1:2016cv02138
Plaintiff:
SALEEM EL-AMIN
Defendant:
APRIL DOWNS, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv02124
Petitioner:
LARRY HALL
Respondent:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEONARD v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2016cv02047
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DANIEL LEONARD
Defendant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
KINARD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv01986
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KINARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv01669
Plaintiff:
VERNON LEWIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWSER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv01455
Plaintiff:
MARK K. BOWSER
Defendant:
SERGEANT D. SMITH and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Varner v. USPC, et al
as 16-5148
Petitioner - Appellant:
Larry A. Varner
Respondent - Appellee:
United States Parole Commission, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Raymond Byrd, Warden, Correctional Treatment Facility - Corrections Corporation of America and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
