Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 571
MORGAN v. JOE BIDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02740
Plaintiff: DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant: JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Rudometkin v. Christine Wormuth
as 23-5181
Plaintiff / Appellant: David J. Rudometkin
Defendant / Appellee: Christine E. Wormuth, in her capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Army
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02367
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WHITEHEAD v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv02121
Plaintiff: ANTONIO WHITEHEAD
Defendant: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE and DAVID S. GOODER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv02223
Plaintiff: DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant: JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROOKS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv01727
Plaintiff: JONATHAN J. ROOKS
Defendant: TOMMY SMITH, SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON CO., TERRY E. BAMARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Rudometkin v. Ryan McCarthy
as 23-5088
Plaintiff / Appellant: David J. Rudometkin
Defendant / Appellee: Ryan D. McCarthy, in his capacity as the Secretary of the Army
NICOLESCU v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv01119
Plaintiff: BOGDAN NICOLESCU
Defendant: MERRICK GARLAND, M. D. CARAVAJAL, DAVID BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
David Morgan v. USA
as 23-5112
Plaintiff / Appellant: David Brian Morgan
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America
WATTLETON v. PETERS
as 1:2023cv00821
Plaintiff: DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant: COLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?