Cases 11 - 20 of 29
GLOVER v. LAMBERTH et al
as 1:2013cv00370
Plaintiff:
FRED M. GLOVER
Defendant:
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH and F. J. CARAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEAL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01424
Petitioner:
FRED NEAL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and US ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. KIRCHNER et al
as 1:2012cv01334
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE JONES
Defendant:
STEVE KIRCHNER, JOSEPH SOPATA, STEPHEN NAUGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAWKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01939
Plaintiff:
LEVI MCRAE LUGINBYHL HAWKINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CLAIRE V. EAGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angela Dozier-Carter v. Debra Lee, et al
as 09-5056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Angela Dozier-Carter
Defendant - Appellee:
Debra Lee, BET Holdings Inc.,Chairman of the Board, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Fred Mueller, III, FBI Director and others
DOZIER-CARTER v. BET HOLDINGS INC., et al
as 1:2008cv02246
Plaintiff:
DOZIER-CARTER
Defendant:
DEBRA LEE, FBI HEADQUARTERS, FRED MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PLUMMER v. FENTY et al
as 1:2008cv01420
Plaintiff:
FRED PLUMMER
Defendant:
ADRIAN M. FENTY and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GLOVER v.SCHUYLKILL FCI, ET AL
as 1:2008cv00713
Plaintiff:
FRED M. GLOVER
Defendant:
SCHUYLKILL FCI, LORI RAGIR and BONNEL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RODRIQUEZ v. SMITH et al
as 1:2008cv00567
Plaintiff:
JOSE A. RODRIQUEZ
Defendant:
STEVEN SMITH, FRED FIGUEROA and D.C. JAIL RECORD DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PLUMMER v. THE MAYOR et al
as 1:2008cv00102
Plaintiff:
FRED PLUMMER
Defendant:
THE MAYOR, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, TABITHA BRAXTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
