Cases 11 - 20 of 48
STRONG v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2017cv02446
Plaintiff:
DYRIAN STRONG
Defendant:
MARY LOU ROBINSON and CLINTON E. AVERITTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Olive, et al v. Mary Lou Robinson, et al
as 17-5239
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jose Manuel Olive, In Propia Persona and Dyrian Strong, In Propia Persona
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vincent Dale Ross, In Propia Persona
Defendant - Appellee:
Mary Lou Robinson, In Her Official & Private Capacities, Clinton Averitte, In His Official & Private Capacities, Barbara Melynn, In Her Official & Private Capacities and others
ROSEBAR et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2017cv00978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSEBAR and ERIN ROSEBAR
Defendant:
DAVID BROOKS, WENDELL ROBINSON, WILLIAM C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVE et al v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL OLIVE, VINCENT DALE ROSS and DYRIAN STRONG
Defendant:
MARY LOU ROBINSON, CLINTON AVERITTE, BARBARA MELYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON-BEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv01874
Plaintiff:
DAVON ROBINSON-BEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2016cv01707
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EARL ROBINSON
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, YARBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROBINSON v. USA
as 1:2016cv01229
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DEVON ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROBINSON v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2016cv00920
Petitioner:
SCOTT ROBINSON
Respondent:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II and HORVATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Mason, et al
as 16-5111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Ms. Mason, A. Warden, Robinson, Unit Mgr., Wright, Case Mgr. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
