Cases 11 - 20 of 213
SMITH v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2019cv02389
Petitioner:
JOSEPH SMITH and ELIJAH SMITH-WEEKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REAVES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2019cv01443
Petitioner:
HAROLD REAVES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (C.S.C.O.A.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2019cv01209
Respondent:
D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Petitioner:
KEWIONNE WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ASHBY v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00748
Respondent:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, CHARLES MASSARONE, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ASHBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
REDMOND v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2018cv02214
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
JESSE R. REDMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIMKA v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2018cv01557
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
EDWARD RIMKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2018cv01484
Plaintiff:
JULIUS WAYNE MILLER
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, WARDEN FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00856
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
COLEMAN v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2018cv00543
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COLEMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. BOLSTER et al
as 1:2018cv00446
Petitioner:
MORRIS J. WARREN
Defendant:
MARK BOLSTER, J. RAY ORMOND and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
