Cases 21 - 30 of 159
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JANET RENO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Harris v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 15-5094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marcus B. Harris
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Honorable, Attorney General, U.S. Justice Department and Jonathan Mark Smith, Chief of Civil Rights, Division in Official Capacity
VILLA v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
EUGENIO VILLA
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., DAVID L. COUNTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherron Phillips v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 15-5066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cherron Marie Phillips
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Michael J. Reagan and others
Seavon Pierce v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 15-5058
Petitioner - Appellant:
Seavon Pierce
Respondent - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Barack Hussein Obama, United States of America and others
HARRIS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
MARCUS B. HARRIS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and JONATHAN M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
CHERRON MARIE PHILLIPS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., MICHAEL J. REAGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAWKINS, JR. v. HOLDER
as 1:2015cv00066
Petitioner:
ISREAL OWEN HAWKINS, JR.
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv00079
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
