Cases 21 - 30 of 335
WRIGHT v. COLORADO SECRETARY OF STATE OFFICE
as 1:2020cv00969
Defendant:
COLORADO SECRETARY OF STATE OFFICE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. WRIGHT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00152
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VILLAFANA v. SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
as 1:2019cv03289
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
Plaintiff:
JACQUES PAUL VILLAFANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02391
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, U.S. TREASURY SECRETARY, WORLD BANK and others
Plaintiff:
SOCIETY OF T.R.U.T.H. and JOHN R. DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02385
Defendant:
U.S. MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, NATIONAL SECURITY DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. GREAT BRITAIN et al
as 1:2019cv00118
Respondent:
NICARAGUA, TERESA MAY, GREAT BRITAIN and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MEYERS v. LEW et al
as 1:2018cv02592
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF F.B.I., POST MASTER GENERAL FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE U.S. INSPECTOR GENERAL and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALONE v. COMMANDER IN CHIEF et al
as 1:2018cv01534
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF TREASURY and COMMANDER IN CHIEF
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MALONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe v. James Mattis
as 18-5032
Petitioner - Appellee:
John Doe
Respondent - Appellant:
James Mattis, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense
SMITHERS v. SMITHERS-THOMAS et al
as 1:2017cv01934
Plaintiff:
BOICE F. SMITHERS, JR.
Defendant:
BRENNA J. SMITHERS-THOMAS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, U.S. NAVY DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
