Cases 21 - 30 of 59
MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2016cv01824
Plaintiff:
JAMAL MITCHELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HILLS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv01072
Petitioner:
DERRICK HILLS
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GARZA v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
as 1:2016cv00976
Plaintiff:
JORGE LUIS GARZA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DAVIS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2015cv02071
Plaintiff:
EUGENE DAVIS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Virgil Hall v. BOP, et al
as 15-5303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Virgil Hall
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshals Service and United States Attorney General
GARZA v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2015cv01744
Petitioner:
GUADALUPE GARZA, JR.
Respondent:
MARTINEZ, BEMENT and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2015cv01670
Plaintiff:
EUGENE DAVIS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKE v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2015cv01151
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BURKE
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Joseph Donelson v. BOP, et al
as 15-5136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Donelson
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshals Service
EVANS v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2014cv01818
Petitioner:
WILLIAMS H. EVANS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
