Cases 31 - 40 of 55
BRYAN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2012cv01624
Plaintiff:
ERROL GEORGE BRYAN, JR
Defendant:
VANCE CARTER and CLIFFORD CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCFADDEN v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2011cv01658
Plaintiff:
TRACY MCFADDEN
Defendant:
SIMON T. WAINWRIGHT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARTER-EL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2011cv01107
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. CARTER-EL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. USA
as 1:2010cv02342
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JEROME M. CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Charles Jones, Jr. v. United States Parole Commissio, et al
as 10-5407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Edward Jones, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Parole Commission, Renee Barley, District of Columbia Parole Board and Daniel Carter, CSO, DC Superior Court, Court Services Offender Supervision Agency
CARTER-EL v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2010cv01778
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. CARTER-EL
Defendant:
ISSAC FULWOOD, JR. and ISSAC JOHNSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
CARTER v. WRIGHT
as 1:2010cv01490
Plaintiff:
MARVIN TERRELL CARTER
Defendant:
WAYNE WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARTER v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2010cv01187
Petitioner:
MYRON CARTER
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ERIC HOLDER and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2010cv00445
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. JONES, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAROLE BOARD, RENEE BARLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
