Cases 31 - 40 of 383
MARRERO v. STATE OF ILLINOIS et al
as 1:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
EDWIN MARRERO
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, STATE OF ILLINOIS GOVERNORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILBOURN v. CLINTON
as 1:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MILBOURN
Defendant:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, GEORGE SORROS and NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv02265
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID RENNER, DIANE MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEONARD v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2016cv02047
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DANIEL LEONARD
Defendant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIGSBY v. THOMAS
as 1:2016cv01918
Petitioner:
GEORGE GRIGSBY
Respondent:
MARY THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARE v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2016cv01815
Petitioner:
GEORGE E. HARE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RONQUEST v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2016cv01634
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROGER RONQUEST
Defendant:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DAVID LEACH, ANTHONY FOXX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv01334
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN M. MISCHO, DUANE MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. USA
as 1:2016cv01325
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
GEORGE WILLIAM SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HOUSER v. CHURCH et al
as 1:2016cv01142
Plaintiff:
GEORGE D. HOUSER
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
