Cases 31 - 38 of 38
DAVIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
ADAM DAVIS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
HOLT v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
GARY WILLIAM HOLT
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DOUG SHULMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COMER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2009cv02455
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COMER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF U.S. ATTORNEY'S, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jasper Dockery v. TREA, et al
as 09-5033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jasper Lloyd Dockery
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
POINDEXTER v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2009cv00203
Plaintiff:
ANTONE POINDEXTER
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DOCKERY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2008cv00806
Plaintiff:
JASPER LLOYD DOCKERY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LEMAY v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES et al
as 1:2007cv01082
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ALLEN LEMAY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COTNER v. UNKNOWN US GOVERNMENT AGENTS et al
as 1:2007cv00520
Plaintiff:
ROBERT COTNER
Defendant:
UNKNOWN US GOVERNMENT AGENTS, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
