Cases 31 - 40 of 2,503
MOQADDEM v. BURGHARDT et al
as 1:2023cv03148
Petitioner:
MAHA MOQADDEM
Respondent:
JOSEPH BURGHARDT and SUPERIOR STATE COURT OF CALIFORNIA AIRPORT COURTHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VISCONTI v. BURGHARDT et al
as 1:2023cv03145
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
JOSEPH BURGHARDT, JESUS BERNAL, SUPERIOR COURTS OF LOS ANGELES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VISCONTI v. NEWSOM et al
as 1:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI and LALA MAHA MOQADDEM (REGRAGUI)
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, SHERRI BLUEBOND, PATRICIA GUERRERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin Akerman v. USA
as 23-5229
Petitioner / Appellant:
Martin Akerman
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
GELIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03039
Plaintiff:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Anthony Braxton v. USA
as 23-5221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 23-5213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
GELIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02855
Plaintiff:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
HEMPHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ANTIONE HEMPHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, JULIAN CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Nelson v. State of Florida, et al
as 23-7117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Nelson
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Florida and Florida Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
