Cases 31 - 40 of 445
MUMIN v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2017cv00726
Plaintiff:
DUKHAN MUMIN
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., LORETTA LYNCH, TIMOTHY E. NOONAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARRERO v. STATE OF ILLINOIS et al
as 1:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
EDWIN MARRERO
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, STATE OF ILLINOIS GOVERNORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CISNEROS v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2016cv02095
Plaintiff:
JUAN GABRIEL CISNEROS
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ANDREW S. HANEN, CHARLES E. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Omari Patton v. USA, et al
as 16-5231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Omari H. Patton
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
VANDIVERE et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv01594
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOW VANDIVERE and JON KARL THOMPSON
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH , ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , THOMAS KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Lewis v. USA, et al
as 16-5218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Janet Reno and others
William Carroll v. State of Florida, et al
as 16-7072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William H. Carroll
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Florida, States Attorneys Office, Public Defenders Office and others
SMITH v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2016cv00998
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. SMITH
Defendant:
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, MICHAEL F. EASLEY and JOHN H. BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDFORD v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2016cv00906
Petitioner:
MIKE REDFORD
Respondent:
BARACK H. OBAMA, LORETTA LYNCH, RON JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv00679
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LORETTA E. LYNCH, JOHN WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
