Cases 31 - 40 of 44
DAVIS v. SUTER et al
as 1:2009cv01989
Plaintiff:
LEANDER G. DAVIS
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, LAURA E. KERNS and LYNNE M. ABRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. SUTER et al
as 1:2009cv01990
Plaintiff:
LEANDER G. DAVIS
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, LAURA E. KERNS and LYNNE M. ABRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUEVANO v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2009cv00071
Plaintiff:
JAIME LUEVANO
Defendant:
GAIL JOHNSON, WILLIAM K. SUTER, US SUPREME CHIEF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Michael Lawrence, et al v. William Suter, et al
as 08-5522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael James Lawrence and William Dean Wetmore
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter and Gail Johnson
Wilmer B. Gay v. William K. Suter, et al
as 08-5404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wilmer B. Gay
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, Clerk, for U.S. Supreme Court, Nicole S. Morris, Esquire, Richard Feder, Esquire and others
GAY v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv01149
Plaintiff:
WILMER B. GAY
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, NICOLE S. MORRIS, RICHARD FEDER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stanley Brown v. William Suter, et al
as 08-5113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stanley E. Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, Clerk for the US Supreme Court, Mia Carpiello, Esquire, Mary E. Butler, Esquire and others
MCDONALD v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv00739
Plaintiff:
MAURICE J. MCDONALD
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, RUTH JONES and OFFICE OF THE CLERK
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MCDONALD v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv00668
Plaintiff:
MAURICE J. MCDONALD
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, RUTH JONES and OFFICE OF THE CLERK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv00375
Plaintiff:
STANLEY E. BROWN
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, MIA CARPIELLO, MARY E. BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
