Cases 41 - 50 of 339
JAMES v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv03086
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, FCC COLEMAN USP I and FCI JESUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARACHA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02567
Petitioner:
MR. SAIFULLAH PARACHA and SAIFULLAH PARACHA
Not Classified By Court:
Hon. LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, Hon. ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and Adm. EDWARD B. CASHMAN
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN
Respondent:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
VIKARA v. STATE OF OREGON et al
as 1:2021cv02570
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARIE ELIZABETH ANNE VIKARA
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON, SAIF, CASCADE PRECISION, INC. and others
Claimant:
BRIAN P. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THIEME v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2021cv01750
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THIEME
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
JAMES v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2021cv00695
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNS v. POLK et al
as 1:2021cv00636
Respondent:
MICHAEL N. BATES, RALSTON D. MARSHALL and BALDEN B. POLK
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD BURNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANDERSON v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Defendant:
NOGAN, DIRECTOR and BRANTLEY
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. ANDERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2021cv00247
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv03566
Defendant:
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, WILLIAM M. JACKSON, MARY LOU LEARY and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
