Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01453
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Maurice Davis v. DC Department of Corrections, et al
as 09-7075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maurice Delane Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
DC Department of Corrections, Devon Brown, Director, D.C. Department of Corrections, Debra Miller, Acting Assistant Administrator and others
JACKSON v. CAMILLETTI et al
as 1:2009cv01110
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEE JACKSON
Defendant:
PAUL T. CAMILLETTI, THOMAS O. MUCKLOW, BRIAN W. BEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reginald Jackson v. DC, et al
as 09-5071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald Allen Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia and United States of America
Michael Gorbey v. DC, et al
as 09-7025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia and Gregory Jackson, Judge
USA v. Gregory Jackson
as 09-3023
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Gregory V. Jackson
GORBEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00261
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and GREGORY JACKSON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JACKSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00260
Plaintiff:
REGINALD ALLEN JACKSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JACKSON V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv00101
Plaintiff:
WAYNE E. JACKSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANNA E. CABRAL and HENRY M. PAULSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DAVIS v. DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2008cv02037
Plaintiff:
MAURICE DELANE DAVIS
Defendant:
DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEVON BROWN, DEBRA MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
