Cases 51 - 60 of 87
LOVE-EL v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2011cv01678
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO LOVE-EL
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, STEPHEN T. NASKO, STEVEN HUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-7073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
WASHINGTON v. USA
as 1:2010cv01747
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CARROLL WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robin Robinson v. United States Marshals Service, et al
as 09-5451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robin Robinson
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Marshals Service, Odie Washington, Director, D.C. Department of Corrections, Steve Smith, Warden, D.C. Department of Corrections and others
Andre Watts v. Timothy Harrison, et al
as 09-7122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andre Sylvester Watts
Defendant - Appellee:
Timothy Harrison, Metropolitan Police Department and District of Columbia
Third-Party Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Gas Light Company and National Union Fire Insurance Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BOURDON et al v. WINTER et al
as 1:2009cv01229
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN THOMAS BOURDON and JEFFERY G. WALLS
Defendant:
DONALD C. WINTER, O TOM CRANE, HARRIS CUMMINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
