Cases 61 - 70 of 134
Robert Koon v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 16-5030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Holland Koon
Defendant - Appellee:
Loretta E. Lynch, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. DOJ, Being Sued In Her Official Capacity, Alan C. Wilson, S.C. Attorney General, Being Sued In His Official Capacity and Jean Toal, Chief Judicial Officer of United Judicial System, S.C. Supreme Court, Being Sued In Her Official Capacity
Raymond Thomas v. J. Smoot, et al
as 16-5024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raymond Thomas
Defendant - Appellee:
J. Patricia Wilson Smoot, Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission and United States Parole Commission
VOID v. SMOOT et al
as 1:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
BRUCE E. VOID
Defendant:
J. PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MIKELL v. SPRINKLE et al
as 1:2015cv01783
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY MIKELL
Defendant:
MEG SPRINKLE and SCARLET A. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOON v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2015cv01358
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HOLLAND KOON
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH, ALAN WILSON and JEAN TOAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Johnson v. DC, et al
as 15-5207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Roy Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, J. Patricia Wilson Smoot, John A. Burke, Detective, Metropolitan Police Department and others
WILSON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2015cv01149
Plaintiff:
BRYAN WILSON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PIERCE v. WILSON et al
as 1:2015cv01096
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. PIERCE
Defendant:
ALAN WILSON and DAN F. LANEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEPHARD v. MORVZIN et al
as 1:2015cv00923
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
MORVZIN, DESNIN, EMPTAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAY v. SMOOT
as 1:2015cv00629
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY D. RAY
Defendant:
J PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
