Cases 71 - 80 of 2,278
GREESON v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
REMBERT D. GREESON
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Julian Okeayainneh v. DOJ, et al
as 23-5093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Julian Okeayainneh
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director/Chief of Human Resources and United States Attorney General
Joshua Taylor v. United States Department of Justice Executive Off
as 23-5092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Mark Taylor
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01141
Petitioner:
ANTHONY T. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BERRY v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BURKE BERRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YUAN v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
as 1:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
JIANBIN YUAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jehu Hand v. DOJ
as 23-5080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jehu Hand
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Norris Williams v. DOJ
as 23-5082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Norris Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
DUNLAP v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE JOSEPH DUNLAP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ADEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00762
Petitioner:
MOUSEN YISAK ADEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
