Cases 81 - 85 of 85
THOMAS v. REILLY et al
as 1:2007cv01689
Plaintiff:
MELVIN THOMAS
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, DEBRA A. SPANGOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWINTON v. REILLY et al
as 1:2007cv01120
Plaintiff:
DARU SWINTON
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRD v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv00332
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. BYRD, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., OTIS THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash, Wilbur v. Reilly, Edward F., et al
as 05-5092
Appellee:
Wilbur Ash, Fred Figueroa, in his official capacity as Warden of the Correctional Treatment Facility and Odie Washington, in his official capacity as Director of the DC Department of Corrections
Appellant:
Edward F. Reilly, Jr., in his official capacity as Commissioner, United States Parole Commission, Cranston J. Mitchell, in his official capacity as Commissioner, United States Parole Commission, Deborah A. Spagnoli, in her official capacity as Commissioner, United States Parole Commission and others
Singletary, Charles v. DC Bd Par, et al
as 04-7013
Appellant:
Charles Singletary
Terminated Party:
D.C. Board of Parole, Michael J. Gaines, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. Parole Commission, John R. Simpson, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. Parole Commission and others
Appellee:
Edward F. Reilly, Jr., in his official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. Parole Commission, Cranston J. Mitchell, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. Parole Commission, Deborah A. Spagnoli, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. Parole Commission and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
