Cases 81 - 90 of 362
CARROLL v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
WESLEY CARROLL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS, DOROTHY A. LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv02296
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KAMALA D. HARRIS, VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEORGE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv02128
Plaintiff:
MARK D. GEORGE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, RODGERS and PETER NEWSHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AGUIAR v. STANCIL et al
as 1:2017cv02050
Plaintiff:
ANDRES AGUIAR
Defendant:
M. A. STANCIL, JACKSON, P. SCARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS v. THIRD CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE et al
as 1:2017cv02057
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
THIRD CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, JACK D. HOWIE and AMANDA SHULER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2017cv01916
Petitioner:
JAMES D. MATTHEWS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHEPHARD v. MASIC et al
as 1:2017cv01843
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
JOHN MASIC, WISEMAN, DUNCON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owen Leavitt v. Donald Trump, et al
as 17-5192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Owen D. Leavitt
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald J. Trump, Jeff Sessions and United States of America
Antoine Degrate v. Scott Harri
as 17-5187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Antoine D. Degrate
Defendant - Appellee:
Scott S. Harris, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States, Office of the Clerk
JENKINS v. CHUANG et al
as 1:2017cv01615
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
THEODORE D. CHUANG and JOSEPH BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
