Cases 1 - 10 of 13
John Demos, Jr., et al v. USA, et al
as 23-5187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Society of T.R.U.T.H
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Washington, D.C., Donald J. Trump, President and others
JACK v. JACK et al
as 1:2023cv02303
Petitioner:
JOHN JACK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF WASHINGTON, OFFICE OF THE BISHIP - DIOCESE OF TEXARKANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
DEMOS v. U.S.A. et al
as 1:2019cv02381
Respondent:
WASHINGTON, D.C., STATE OF WASHINGTON and U.S.A.
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02391
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, U.S. TREASURY SECRETARY, WORLD BANK and others
Plaintiff:
SOCIETY OF T.R.U.T.H. and JOHN R. DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CRAYTON v. STATE OF WASHINGTON
as 1:2017cv01847
Plaintiff:
LEE DARRELL CRAYTON
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAYTON v. STATE OF WASHINGTON
as 1:2017cv01848
Petitioner:
LEE DARRELL CRAYTON
Respondent:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01687
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMOS v. STATE OF WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2017cv00203
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv02444
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DEMOS, JR. v. STATE OF WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2015cv00758
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF WASHINGTON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
