Cases 1 - 10 of 421
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5253
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bobby Grady v. Louise Flanagan
as 23-5097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bobby Ray Grady
Defendant / Appellee:
Louise W. Flanagan, U.S. District Court Judge
Lamar Forbes v. Carlos Del Toro, et al
as 23-5012
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lamar A. Forbes
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas W. Harker, Secretary of the Navy, Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy and Randall Lamoureux, President, Naval Clemency and Parole Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02452
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HUNTER v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2022cv01787
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MALCOLM HUNTER
Defendant:
WARDEN, COMMISSIONER, A/W OF MEDICAL CENTRAL PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelvin Miles v. William Barr, et al
as 22-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kelvin J. Miles
Defendant / Appellee:
William Barr, John D. Ashcroft, Alberto R. Gonzales and others
DAWSON v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAWSON
Defendant:
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, DONALD HICKS, RAYNARD T. FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams, et al
as 22-5056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
CRAWFORD v. WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS DEON CRAWFORD
Defendant:
WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY, HUGH HARVEY, JR., JODY S. PICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORBEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, FORREN, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
