Labor Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 74
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
United Brotherhood of Carpent, et al v. Operative Plasterers' & Cemen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-7155
Plaintiff - Appellant: United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners Of America and Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters
Defendant - Appellee: Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association of the United States & Canada, AFL-CIO
National Federation Of Federal v. Thomas Vilsack, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-5135
Plaintiff - Appellant: National Federation of Federal Employees-IAM
Defendant - Appellee: Thomas J. Vilsack, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture and Thomas L. Tidwell, in his official capacity as Chief of the United States Forest Service
UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA et al v. OPERATIVE PLASTERERS' & CEMENT MASONS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES & CANADA, AFL-CIO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00353
Plaintiff: UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA and SOUTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Defendant: OPERATIVE PLASTERERS' & CEMENT MASONS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES & CANADA, AFL-CIO
Counter_defendant: UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA
Cross_claimant: OPERATIVE PLASTERERS' & CEMENT MASONS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES & CANADA, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
United Brotherhood of Carpente, et al v. Operative Plasters' & Cement M
as 10-7134
Petitioner - Appellant: United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO and Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters
Respondent - Appellee: Operative Plasters' & Cement Masons' International Association of the United States & Canada, AFL-CIO
United Brotherhood of Carpente, et al v. Operative Plasters' & Cement M
as 10-7131
Petitioner - Appellee: United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO and Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters
Respondent - Appellant: Operative Plasters' & Cement Masons' International Association of the United States & Canada, AFL-CIO
American Postal Workers Union, v. USPS
as 10-5249
Plaintiff - Appellant: American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO
Defendant - Appellee: United States Postal Service
UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA et al v. OPERATIVE PLASTERS' & CEMENT MASONS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES & CANADA, AFL-CIO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02212
Petitioner: UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA and SOUTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Respondent: OPERATIVE PLASTERS' & CEMENT MASONS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES & CANADA, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Type: Labor › None
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01217
Plaintiff: AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 1208 1970 Postal Act-enforced supervision by parent union
Type: Labor › None
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01218
Plaintiff: AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 1208 1970 Postal Act-enforced supervision by parent union
Type: Labor › None
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2009cv01212
Plaintiff: AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 1208 1970 Postal Act-enforced supervision by parent union
Type: Labor › None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?