Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MENDOZA CEDILLO et al v. AL'S MARKET, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02122
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO MENDOZA CEDILLO, PACO CEDILLO RAMOS and DINORA RAMOS
Defendant:
MICHAEL BRIAN SCHUSTER, ROSE MICHELE PREVITE, MARCELLE G. AFRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DOE #1 et al v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES et al
as 1:2020cv01558
Defendant:
Arnold Scott, Gerald Swanke, George McCubbin and others
Not Classified By Court:
John Doe #1 et al. and John and Jane Does AFGE Officers, Employees and Agents
Plaintiff:
VALYRIA LEWIS, ANNETTE WELLS, WAQAS KALYAR and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
HASHEM v. AL SHABI et al
as 1:2017cv01645
Defendant:
RASHEED AL SHABI and ETIHAD AIRWAYS, COMPANY
Plaintiff:
PAULA HASHEM
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
K. Lewis, et al v. PBGC
as 17-5068
Plaintiff - Appellee:
K. Wendell Lewis, et al.
Defendant - Appellant:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
AL-QURAN v. MJ PROPERTY LLC et al
as 1:2014cv02144
Plaintiff:
MURAD AL-QURAN
Defendant:
MJ PROPERTY LLC, 4115 8TH STREET NW, LLC, JEFF PAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
BALDERAS et al v. BRW, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00956
Plaintiff:
JOSE BALDERAS , AHMAD AL-BAHRY , HECTOR ADRIAN MARTINEZ and others
Defendant:
BRW, INC., BILLY RAY WHITE, SUNNY WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SAUNDERS v. PARKER et al
as 1:2008cv00715
Plaintiff:
NATHAN A. SAUNDERS, II
Defendant:
GEORGE PARKER, MICHELLE RHEE, ADRIAN FENTY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Everett, M.A., et al v. US Airways Group Inc, et al
as 96-7158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M. A. Everett, et al, Robert J. Brock, Captain, Alan D. Buch, Captain and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
USAir Group, Inc. and USAir, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
US Airways Group, Inc., US Airways, Inc. and Retirement And Income Plan For Pilots Of USAir, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
