Cases 151 - 160 of 57,643
WILLIAMS v. APPLE INC.
as 1:2023cv03901
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2024cv01555
Plaintiff:
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK
Defendant:
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ZANO v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2022cv02748
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BILLINGS CLINIC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
BILLINGS CLINIC, BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL doing business as BEAUMONT HEALTH - FARMINGTON HILLS, CAMDEN-CLARK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as CAMDEN CLARK MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
WELTY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
as 1:2024cv01549
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TODD WELTY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
CONSIGLI CONSTRUCTION CO. INC., v. EASTERN GLASS & ALUMINUM, INC.
as 1:2024cv01545
Plaintiff:
CONSIGLI CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.,
Defendant:
EASTERN GLASS & ALUMINUM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HOLLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01536
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN G. HOLLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
