Cases 11 - 17 of 17
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. STAPLES, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv02115
Petitioner:
DETROIT REGIONAL CHAMBER, RENT-A-CENTER, INC., GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
OFFICE DEPOT, INC. and STAPLES, INC.
Interested Party:
JOHN DOE, LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC., NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM and others
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Intervenor:
JOHN DOE CORPORATION III
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
In Re: APPLICATION FOR DMCA SUBPOENA
as 1:2013mc00338
Petitioner:
CENGAGE LEARNING, INC.
Respondent:
AMAZON.COM LEGAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AMAZON.COM, INC.
as 1:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Daniel Parisi, et al v. Lawrence Sinclair, et al
as 11-7135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Parisi, Whitehouse.com Inc., Whitehouse Network LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Lawrence W Sinclair, also known as Larry Sinclair, Jeffrey Rense, Barnes & Noble, Inc. and others
Daniel Parisi, et al v. Lawrence Sinclair, et al
as 11-7077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Parisi, Whitehouse.com Inc., Whitehouse Network Llc and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Lawrence W. Sinclair, also known as Larry Sinclair, Jeffrey Rense, Barnes & Noble Inc and others
PARISI et al v. SINCLAIR et al
as 1:2010cv00897
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PARISI , WHITEHOUSE.COM INC. , WHITEHOUSE NETWORK LLC and others
Defendant:
LAWRENCE W. SINCLAIR, JEFFREY RENSE, BARNES & NOBLE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES v. AMAZON.COM INC et al
as 1:2007cv00623
Plaintiff:
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM INC, AMAZON.COM INC, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
