Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Eastman Chemical Company v. EPA
as 13-1114
Petitioner:
Eastman Chemical Company
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Eastman Chemical Company v. EPA
as 13-1087
Petitioner:
Eastman Chemical Company
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
OUACHITA RIVERKEEPER, INC. et al v. BOSTICK et al
as 1:2012cv00803
Intervenor Defendant:
EL DORADO WATER UTILITIES, GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL COMPANY, LION OIL COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
OUACHITA RIVERKEEPER, INC. and SAVE THE OUACHITA, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MERDITH W.B. TEMPLE and THOMAS P. BOSTICK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF CERTAIN COENZYME Q10 PRODUCTS AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME
as 1:2012mc00048
Petitioner:
KANEKA CORPORATION
Respondent:
MITSUBISHI GAS CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., AKIO YOSHIDA, TOMOKAZU TACHIKAWA and others
Eastman Chemical Company v. EPA
as 11-1171
Petitioner:
Eastman Chemical Company
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Montana Sulphur & Chemical Com v. EPA
as 11-1080
Petitioner:
Montana Sulphur & Chemical Company
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
GREENPEACE, INC. v. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY et al
as 1:2010cv02037
Plaintiff:
GREENPEACE, INC.
Defendant:
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, SASOL NORTH AMERICA, INC., DEZENHALL RESOURCES, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Montana Sulphur & Chemical Com v. EPA
as 10-1254
Petitioner:
Montana Sulphur & Chemical Company
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Drexel Chemical Company, et al
as 09-5329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Drexel Chemical Company, American Arbitration Association and Federal Mediation & Conciliation Service
USA v. Deloitte LLP
as 09-5171
Movant - Appellant:
United States of America
Respondent - Appellee:
Deloitte & Touche USA, LLP and Deloitte LLP
Intervenor For Appellee:
Dow Chemical Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
