Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 474
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
USA v. Morez King
as 24-3038
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Morez King
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00846
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NEA BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00419
Not Yet Classified: NEA BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CRITTENDEN, BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL UNION COUNTY and others
Plaintiff: BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, COREWELL HEALTH GROSSE POINTE HOSPITAL, COREWELL HEALTH WILLIAM BEAUMONT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03842
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv03811
Plaintiff: CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER, ATRIUM HEALTH PINEVILLE, ATRIUM HEALTH ANSON and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
KING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03512
Plaintiff: LYNN GISELE KING
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03383
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KING v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv02506
Plaintiff: LAKISHA KING
Defendant: COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?