Cases 11 - 16 of 16
JONES v. KARPINSKI et al
as 1:2010cv00560
Plaintiff:
JASON EARL JONES
Defendant:
WALT KARPINSKI, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Jones v. USA, et al
as 09-5245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jason Earl Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of State, United States Department of Treasury and others
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv00849
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amer Bar Assn v. FTC
as 04-5257
Plaintiff - Appellee:
American Bar Association
Defendant - Appellant:
Federal Trade Commission
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
The Conference of Chief Justices
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Akron Bar Association, Alabama State Bar Association, Arkansas Bar Association and others
USA, et al v. Leg Svc NY, et al
as 00-5244
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Leonard Koczur, Acting Inspector General of the Legal Services Corporation
Appellee:
United States of America and Legal Aid Bureau, Inc.
Terminated Party:
Edouard R. Quatrevaux, Inspector General of the Legal Services Corporation
Appellant:
Legal Services for New York
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
New York State Bar Association, Alameda County (California) Bar Association, The Asian-American Legal Defense Education Fund and others
Cty Los Angeles v. Shalala, Donna E.
as 98-5254
Plaintiff - Appellee:
County of Los Angeles, a political subdivision of the State of California, owner and operator of Los Angeles County/USC Medical Center, Harbor/UCLA Medical Center, Martin Luther King Jr./Drew Medical Center, Olive View Medical Center and High Desert Hospi
Defendant - Appellant:
Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
