Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Calpine Corporation, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1177
Petitioner: Consolidated Edison, Inc., Power Companies Climate Coalition, National Grid USA and others
Respondent: United States Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Calpine Corporation, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1245
Petitioner: Consolidated Edison, Inc., Power Companies Climate Coalition, National Grid USA and others
Respondent: United States Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT et al v. CHAO et al
as 1:2019cv03436
Defendant: Sec. ELAINE L. CHAO, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff: SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT and SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Petitioner: CALPINE CORPORATION, POWER COMPANIES CLIMATE COALITION, NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY and others
Intervenor Defendant: ASSOCIATION OF GLOBAL AUTOMAKERS, INC.
Intervenor: COALITION FOR SUSTAINABLE AUTOMOTIVE REGULATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706
Consolidated Edison, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 19-1188
Petitioner: Consolidated Edison, Inc., Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Exelon Corporation and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae: Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor: American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae: William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
Emera Maine, et al v. FERC
as 15-1212
Petitioner: Emera Maine, formerly known as Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, Central Maine Power Company, New England Power Company, doing business as National Grid and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Emera Maine, et al v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1139
Petitioner: Emera Maine, formerly known as Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, Central Maine Power Company, Maine Electric Power Company, Inc. and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: LSP Transmission Holdings, LLC and LS Power Transmission, LLC
Emera Maine, et al v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1118
Petitioner: Emera Maine, formerly known as Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, Central Maine Power Company, New England Power Company, doing business as National Grid and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA
as 14-1015
Petitioner: Utility Air Regulatory Group
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Respondent: Calpine Corporation, Exelon Corporation, National Grid Generation, LLC and others
Intervenor For Petitioner: Edgecombe Genco, LLC and Spruance Genco, LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?