Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
In Re: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE PRIVACY ACT PROTECTIVE ORDER
as 1:2013mc00501
Petitioner: PATRICK R. DONAHOE
Cause Of Action: Motion for Protective Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5070
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00301
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WASHINGTON v. DONAHOE et al
as 1:2013cv00041
Plaintiff: DEBBIE WASHINGTON
Defendant: PATRICK R. DONAHOE, PRINCE JONES, NIGEL MCCLEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IDROGO v. DONAHOE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02066
Plaintiff: MICHAEL IDROGO
Defendant: PATRICK R. DONAHOE, JO BONNER and HOPE ANDRADE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01772
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HARRIS v. DONAHOE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00145
Plaintiff: ARETHA HARRIS
Defendant: PATRICK R. DONAHOE and DOUG FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01839
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01003
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United America Financial, Inco v. Patrick Donahoe
as 11-5111
Plaintiff - Appellant: United America Financial, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellee: Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?