Cases 21 - 30 of 31
HILL v. MIDDLEBROOKS
as 1:2008cv02148
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
SCOTT A. MIDDLEBROOKS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HILL v. MIDDLEBROOKS
as 1:2008cv01682
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
SCOTT A. MIDDLEBROOKS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Eric Hill v. Brian Jett, et al
as 08-5109
Petitioner - Appellant:
Eric Rodney Hill
Respondent - Appellee:
Brian R. Jett, Warden and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
HILL v. JETT et al
as 1:2008cv00679
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
BRIAN R. JETT and H. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HILL v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2008cv00563
Plaintiff:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE and DC CORPORATION COUNSEL
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HILL v. JETT
as 1:2008cv00091
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
BRIAN R. JETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. JETT et al
as 1:2007cv02324
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
BRIAN R. JETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. DC CORPORATION COUNSEL et al
as 1:2007cv01424
Plaintiff:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Defendant:
DC CORPORATION COUNSEL, SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and DC GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. VEACH et al
as 1:2007cv01137
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
RICK V. VEACH and KENNETH L. WAINSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. VEACH
as 1:2007cv00886
Respondent:
RICK V. VEACH
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
