Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 b Agency Decision - Right to Counsel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NGUYEN v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2022cv03408
Plaintiff:
DUY NGUYEN
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
NGUYEN v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2022cv03204
Plaintiff:
THI BICH SON NGUYEN
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALISSA L. EMMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
NGUYEN v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2022cv02646
Plaintiff:
ATONY NGUYEN
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM, LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW WEISS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PHAM et al v. MARIE C. DAMOUR
as 1:2022cv02706
Plaintiff:
PHUOC XUAN PHAM, HOA THAI XUAN PHAM, LINH THUY NGUYEN and others
Defendant:
CONSUL GENERAL MARIE C. DAMOUR and MARIE C. DAMOUR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
