Cases 21 - 30 of 99
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 21-5006
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Physicians for Social Responsibility and WildEarth Guardians
Defendant / Appellant:
David L. Bernhardt, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, William Perry Pendley, Acting Director of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Petroleum Association of Wyoming, American Petroleum Institute and Western Energy Alliance
Intervenor / Appellee:
State of Utah and State of Wyoming
STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03715
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
STATE OF ALABAMA et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 1:2020cv03551
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC agent of d/b/a MR. COOPER and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as MR. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps
as 20-5201
Amicus Curiae:
State of North Dakota, State of Arkansas, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Yankton Sioux Tribe, 16cv1796, Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Not Yet Classified:
Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Dakota Access LLC
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps
as 20-5197
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Dakota Access LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267, Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and others
Not Yet Classified:
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Steve Vance
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae:
North Dakota Grain Dealers Association, North Dakota Farm Bureau, American Line Pipe Producers Association and others
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT et al v. BERNHARDT et al
as 1:2020cv00860
Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Petitioner:
MURDOCK LAND AND LIVESTOCK CO., WYOMING STOCK GROWERS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF WYOMING and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
RUTKOWSKY et al v. ZAG HOSPITALITY LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01337
Plaintiff:
MARRION RUTKOWSKY and JOHN RUTKOWSKY
Defendant:
KELSEY M. RULE, ZAG HOSPITALITY LLC and ZAG HOSPITALITY LLC a citizen of the State of Wyoming doing business as BLINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE et al v. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
as 1:2019cv00746
Plaintiff:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant:
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Petitioner:
STATE OF WYOMING
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
