Cases 41 - 50 of 51
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES et al v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2009cv01695
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES and RIVER FIELDS, INC.
Defendant:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, VICTOR MENDEZ and JOSE SEPULVEDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
BROWN et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv01663
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DEMITRI BROWN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, LAPPIN, R. S. BALLASH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COUNTY BOARD OF ARLINGTON VIRGINIA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 1:2009cv01570
Plaintiff:
COUNTY BOARD OF ARLINGTON VIRGINIA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RAYMOND H. LAHOOD, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
BERGMANN v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 1:2009cv01378
Plaintiff:
DIETRICH R. BERGMANN
Defendant:
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RAY LAHOOD, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
GERONIMO et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2009cv00303
Plaintiff:
HARLYN GERONIMO, HARLYN C. GERONIMO, KATE GERONIMO and others
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ROBERT M. GATES, PETE GEREN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MENDEZ v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv01296
Petitioner:
RAPHEAL MENDEZ
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, M. HAUGEN, M. STALKER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FENLON et al v. SUTER et al
as 1:2007cv01652
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. FENLON
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, CLAYTON R. HIGGINS, JR., DONNA MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
