Cases 41 - 50 of 113
WOOD v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES et al
as 1:2016cv02139
Defendant:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES , J. DAVID COX and NATHANIEL NELSON
Plaintiff:
DUANE WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv01334
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN M. MISCHO, DUANE MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PRESSLEY v. USA
as 1:2016cv01223
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DUANE PRESSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ZHANG et al v. MALAYSIA AIRLINES BERHAD et al
as 1:2016cv01048
Plaintiff:
JIANGUO ZHANG, HUATIAN HU, JIN LIU and others
Defendant:
MALAYSIA AIRLINES BERHAD, MALYSIAN AIRLINES SYSTEM BERHAD, ALLLIANZ GLOBAL CORPORATE AND SPECIALTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AIR CRASH OVER THE SOUTHERN INDIAN OCEAN, ON MARCH 8, 2014
as 1:2016mc01184
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WOOD , THOMAS C. GASPARD, ELIZABETH SMITH and others
Defendant:
MALAYSIA AIRLINES BERHAD, MALAYSIAN AIRLINES SYSTEM BERHAD , ALLIANZ GLOBAL CORPORATE AND SPECIALTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BERRY v. LYNCH
as 1:2016cv00982
Plaintiff:
DUANE LETROY BERRY
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
DUANE MCKINNEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, P. LANE and L. J. ODDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01412
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
George Keepseagle, et al v. Thomas Vilsack
as 15-5011
Plaintiff - Appellee:
George B. Keepseagle, Luther Crasco, John Fredericks, III and others
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Timothy Labatte
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture
Movant - Appellant:
Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and Jones Academy Foundation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
