Cases 41 - 50 of 84
BAILEY v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2009cv01260
Petitioner:
ARI BAILEY
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JR.,, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, EDWARD F. REILLY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alvin Truesdale v. DOJ, et al
as 09-5215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alvin B. Truesdale
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission, Federal Bureau of Prisons, All in their official capacity and others
VINES v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2009cv00813
Plaintiff:
JAMES ARTHUR VINES
Defendant:
GEORGE SNYDER and EDWARD REILLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOORE v. REILLY et al
as 1:2009cv00795
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE W. MOORE
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, DEBORAH A. SPAGNOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. REILLY et al
as 1:2009cv00749
Plaintiff:
MELVIN J. TAYLOR
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romes Austin v. Edward Reilly, Jr.
as 09-5133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Romes Austin
Defendant - Appellee:
Edward F. Reilly, Jr.
ANDERSON v. REILLY et al
as 1:2009cv00521
Plaintiff:
RONALD ANDERSON
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, SANDRA G. HYLTON and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ROY v. REILLY
as 1:2009cv00463
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROY
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
QUALLS v. REILLY et al
as 1:2009cv00311
Plaintiff:
SEANS QUALLS
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR. and SANDRA G. HYLTON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
QUALLS v. REILLY et al
as 1:2009cv00275
Plaintiff:
SEAN QUALLS
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., SANDRA G. HYLTON and US PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
