Cases 41 - 50 of 74
LIVINGSTON et al v. BLANK et al
as 1:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LIVINGSTON , PAUL RAYMOND , CHRISTOPHER SHOPPMEYER and others
Defendant:
REBECCA BLANK and NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ELLIS v. SHULMAN et al
as 1:2012cv01795
Plaintiff:
JULIE ELLIS
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, NEAL WOLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SPENCER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2012cv00042
Plaintiff:
KENNETH S. SPENCER, JR. , FRANCES A. SPENCER , AMY L. MORROW and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
WEST v. RIOS
as 1:2011cv01728
Plaintiff:
LEOTHIS WEST
Defendant:
ROSIE RIOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angel Rivera v. Russell Wolff, et al
as 11-5202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Angel Ruiz Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
Russell Wolff, Esq., Ellen Bass, Esq., U.S. Department of Education (USDE), Office of the Inspector General (OIG), Rafael Nater, Esq., USDE-OIG Chief Auditor of Puerto Rico's Office Porfirio Rios, USDE'S International Review Branch and others
ALEGENT HEALTH - IMMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER et al v SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00139
Plaintiff:
ALEGENT HEALTH - IMMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER , ALEGENT HEALTH - BERGAN MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM , ANNA JAQUES HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Leothis West v. Rosie Rio
as 11-5003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Leothis West
Defendant - Appellee:
Rosie Rios
WEST v. RIOS
as 1:2010cv02337
Plaintiff:
LEOTHIS WEST
Defendant:
ROSIE RIOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEST v. RIOS
as 1:2010cv02098
Plaintiff:
LEOTHIS WEST
Defendant:
ROSIE RIOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
