Cases 41 - 50 of 275
Ecolift Corporation v. FAA
as 20-1136
Petitioner:
Ecolift Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration
City of Scottsdale, Arizona v. FAA, et al
as 20-1070
Respondent:
Stephen Dickson, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration and Federal Aviation Administration
Petitioner:
City of Scottsdale, Arizona
Multi-Aero, Inc., et al v. FAA
as 20-1054
Petitioner:
Kevin Anthony Sander and Multi-Aero, Inc., d/b/a Air Choice One
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration
RUGG v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2020cv00071
Plaintiff:
LINDA RUGG
Defendant:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2019cv03747
Plaintiff:
Paul Hudson, Flyers Rights Education Fund, Inc. and NO PARTY
Defendant:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Tuscola Area Airport Authority, et al v. Stephen Dickson
as 19-1258
Petitioner:
Almer Charter Township, Michigan, Eric King, Dale Heinlein and others
Respondent:
Stephen Dickson, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
VIZCARRA CALDERON v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2019cv03667
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA VIZCARRA CALDERON
Defendant:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Spirit Airlines, Inc. v. DOT, et al
as 19-1248
Petitioner:
Spirit Airlines, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration and United States Department of Transportation
Electronic Privacy Info v. Drone Advisory Committee, et al
as 19-5238
Defendant / Appellee:
David W. Freeman, in his Official Capacity as Committee Management Officer of the Department of Transportation, Drone Advisory Committee, Federal Aviation Administration and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Exhaustless Inc. v. FAA
as 19-1158
Petitioner:
Exhaustless Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
