Cases 51 - 57 of 57
SULLIVAN v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2007cv00685
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MICHAEL V. HAYDEN and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Scott Tooley v. Janet Napolitano
as 07-5080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Scott Tooley
Defendant - Appellee:
George W. Bush, President, Richard B. Cheney, Vice President, Alberto R. Gonzales, former Attorney General of the United States, in his personal capacity and others
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Cassandra Sturkie Bernstein and Richard Paul Bress
Harbury, Jennifer K. v. Hayden, Michael V., et al
as 06-5282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jennifer K. Harbury, on her own behalf and as administratrix of the Estate of Efrain Bamaca-Valasquez
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael V. Hayden, Director, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), John M. Deutch, Director, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), R. James Woolsey, Director, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Barney Frank
PETER B. v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2006cv01652
Plaintiff:
PETER B.
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MARGARET PEGGY LYONS, DOES #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2006cv01080
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MICHAEL V. HAYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Young, Ronald D., et al v. WA Gas Light Co
as 99-7091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald D. Young, Billy A. Eller, Jesse C. Brooks and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Gas Light Company
Gleklen, Amy v. Dem Cong Campgn Com, et al
as 99-7041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Amy Gleklen
Defendant - Appellee:
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Incorporated, Matthew Angle, Dennis Hayden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
