Cases 51 - 58 of 58
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $83,225.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2007cv02185
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$83,225.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $9,436.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2007cv02155
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$9,436.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $123,518.73 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2007cv01658
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$123,518.73 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 2004 LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO et al
as 1:2007cv01512
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
2004 LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO, $6,100.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 2007 MERCEDES BENZ S-550 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $88,417.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2007cv01271
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$88,417.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $6,075.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2007cv00976
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$6,075.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $21,600 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2007cv00580
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$21,600 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $14,860.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2007cv00175
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$14,860.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Claimant:
ALFRED T. HOPKINS
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
