Cases 51 - 60 of 2,017
JACKSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
MELVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and CURTIS CRISTE
SWEENEY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SWEENEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BAYLOR v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
TAMIKA BAYLOR
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
OROMO EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF WASHINGTON DC v. AVALON SETTLEMENTS, INC.
as 1:2024cv00556
Other:
OROMO EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF WASHINGTON DC
Defendant:
AVALON SETTLEMENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Other:
Brad Greenspan
WP COMPANY LLC. v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
WP COMPANY LLC d/b/a The Washington Post and WP COMPANY LLC. doing business as WASHINGTON POST
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
HENDERSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
KATHY HENDERSON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER
State of Washington, et al v. FERC
as 24-1025
Petitioner:
State of Washington and State of Oregon
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
WP COMPANY LLC. v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
WP COMPANY LLC d/b/a The Washington Post and WP COMPANY LLC. doing business as WASHINGTON POST
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
