Cases 61 - 70 of 181
CALIFORNIA ENERGY INVESTMENT CENTER, LLC v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2017cv02249
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA ENERGY INVESTMENT CENTER, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES , L. FRANCIS CISSNA , NICHOLAS COLUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ABDULWAHHAB v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv02235
Plaintiff:
HASAN A. ABDULWAHHAB
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ELAINE C. DUKE and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
HARRAKA v. DUKE et al
as 1:2017cv02170
Plaintiff:
SUHAIB HARRAKA
Defendant:
ELAINE DUKE, JAMES MCCAMENT, ERIN FATICA and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
WESELINSKI v. DUKE et al
as 1:2017cv02137
Plaintiff:
LUKASZ JAN WESELINSKI
Defendant:
ELAINE DUKE , JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III , L. FRANCIS CISSNA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
GARDEN STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DUKE et al
as 1:2017cv02135
Plaintiff:
GARDEN STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ELAINE DUKE, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, JAMES MCCAMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
