Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Appalachian Voices, et al v. FERC
as 24-1150
Petitioner:
Appalachian Voices, Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Appalachian Voices, et al v. FERC
as 24-1094
Petitioner:
Appalachian Voices, Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
Sierra Club, et al v. FERC
as 20-1427
Petitioner:
Center for Biological Diversity, Appalachian Voices, Chesapeake Climate Action Network and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
USA v. 8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy, Flor, et al
as 10-5061
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy, Florida 32351, One Condo Located On North Ocean Boulevard In Myrtle Beach, South Carolina and All Funds Including Approximately $53 Million, On Deposit At Bank Of America Accounts Of (1) Thomas A. Bowdoin, Jr., , (2) Clarence Busby, Jr. & Dawn Stowers,& (3) Golden Panda Ad Builder, Thomas A. Bowdoin, Jr., Sole Proprietor, dba Adsurfdaily; Clarenc
Claimant - Appellant:
Adsurfdaily, Inc., Thomas A. Bowdoin and Bowdoin Harris Enterprises, Inc.
Claimant - Appellee:
Golden Panda Ad Builder, Clarence Busby, Michael Haws and others
BRIDIE et al v. ADLER et al
as 1:2007cv01634
Plaintiff:
THERESA BRIDIE and STELLA STORM
Defendant:
GARY C. ADLER, ROBERT M. ADLER, ALLISON ILENE BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
