Cases 1 - 6 of 6
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
as 1:2021cv02805
Counter Defendant:
JANE SMITH
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
3Rd Party Defendant:
CORAM CVS SPECIALTY INFUSION SERVICES, CAREFIRST OF MARYLAND, INC. doing business as CAREFIRST BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD, GROUP HOSPITALIZATION AND MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. doing business as CAREFIRST BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION v. CELGENE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2020cv01980
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and CELGENE CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION and FEDERAL EMPLOYEE PROGRAM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01493
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC, CIGNA CORP. and ANTHEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Petitioner:
KAISER PERMANENTE HEALTH PLAN, INC., TUFTS ASSOCIATED HEALTH PLANS, INC., MERCER and others
Special Master:
RICHARD A. LEVIE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
LILLARD & LILLARD, P.C. v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
LILLARD & LILLARD, P.C.
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION , R&R PROFESSIONAL RECOVERY , NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HOPKINS v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION
as 1:2010cv00900
Plaintiff:
SHEILA WATSON HOPKINS
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUTHERFORD et al v. GROUP HOSPITALIZATION AND MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00101
Plaintiff:
JANE K. RUTHERFORD and RICHARD W. RUTHERFORD
Defendant:
GROUP HOSPITALIZATION AND MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. and BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
