Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Northeast Georgia Medical Center, 14cv503 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital Company, Llc, 14cv1477, doing business as Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital Company, Llc, Lafayette General Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Memorial Hospital Flagler, Inc., 15cv192 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Longmont United Hospital, 15-cv-01800, Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER et al v. THOMAS EDMUNDS PRICE
as 1:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER , SAINT ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER , SAINT JAMES HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
THOMAS EDMUNDS PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395
Southeast Alabama Medical Cent v. Kathleen Sebelius
as 08-5156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Southeast Alabama Medical Center, Marshall Medical Center South, Marshall Medical Center North and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael O. Leavitt, Charles E. Johnson and Kathleen Sebelius
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
