Cases 1 - 10 of 17
ELLIS v. SHULMAN et al
as 1:2012cv01795
Plaintiff:
JULIE ELLIS
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, NEAL WOLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keith Caldwell, Sr. v. Elena Kagan, et al
as 12-5298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith Robert Caldwell, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, U.S., Douglas H. Ginsburg, U.S. Court of Appeals and others
RODRIGUEZ et al v. SHULMAN et al
as 1:2011cv01183
Plaintiff:
IRENE D. RODRIGUEZ and ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, WILLIAM J. WILKINS, DEBORAH A. BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Janet Marcusse v. Barack Obama, et al
as 10-5209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Janet Marcusse
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Obama, President of the United States, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury and others
MARCUSSE v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00806
Plaintiff:
JANET MARCUSSE
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, ERIC HOLDER, TIMOTHY GEITHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanya Bennett-Bey v. Douglas Shulman
as 10-5107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tanya Bennett-Bey
Defendant - Appellee:
Douglas Shulman, Commissioner, I.R.S.
Floyd Bennett-Bey v. Douglas Shulman
as 10-5100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Floyd Bennett-bey
Defendant - Appellee:
Douglas Shulman, Commissioner, I.R.S.
BENNETT-BEY v. SHULMAN
as 1:2010cv00257
Plaintiff:
TANYA BENNETT-BEY
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402 Refund of Taxes
Glenn Winningham v. Douglas Shulman, et al
as 10-5039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Glenn Winningham
Defendant - Appellee:
Douglas Shulman, Mark Everson, Dennis Parizek and others
WINNINGHAM v. SHULMAN et al
as 1:2009cv02435
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, MARK EVERSON, DENNIS PARIZEK and others
Plaintiff:
GLEN WINNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
