Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA, INC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01366
Plaintiff:
ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITAL MANHATTAN INC, ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITAL PITTSBURG, INC., ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITALS WICHITA INC and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
C.G.B. et al v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv01072
Plaintiff:
L.M., K.M., M.J.J. and others
Defendant:
CHAD WOLF and WILLIAM BARR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
RREEF INFRASTRUCTURE (G.P.) LIMITED et al v. KINGDOM OF SPAIN
as 1:2019cv03783
Petitioner:
RREEF INFRASTRUCTURE (G.P.) LIMITED and RREEF PAN-EUROPEAN INFRASTRUCTURE TWO LUX S.A.R.L.
Respondent:
KINGDOM OF SPAIN
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
ARCELORMITTAL USA LLC et al v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv03379
Plaintiff:
ARCELORMITTAL DOFASCO G.P. and ARCELORMITTAL USA LLC
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
AFFINITY HOSPITAL, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv02310
Plaintiff:
CAMPBELL COUNTY, HMA, LLC, DHSC, LLC, AMORY HMA, LLC and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
AFFINITY HOSPITAL, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv02110
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
DEACONESS HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, LEXINGTON HOSPITAL CORPORATION, EMPORIA HOSPITAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
AFFINITY HOSPITAL, LLC et al v. ALEX M AZAR II
as 1:2018cv01956
Plaintiff:
GADSDEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, DEACONESS HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, CLEVELAND TENNESSEE HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
ALEX M AZAR II and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
New DBSD Satellite Services v. FCC, et al
as 10-1401
Petitioner:
New DBSD Satellite Services G.P., Debtor-in-Possession
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
